Statistical significance of meteorite-asteroid pairs using geocentric parameters
P.M. Shober

TL;DR
This study tests the statistical connection between meteorite falls and NEAs using geocentric parameters, finding no significant evidence of clustering or streams, suggesting meteorites mostly arrive independently.
Contribution
It introduces a method to assess the statistical significance of meteorite-asteroid associations using geocentric similarity functions and large datasets, with no detected clustering.
Findings
No significant clustering between meteorites and NEAs.
Streams, if present, constitute less than 0.1% of meteorite falls.
Physical processes may explain meteorite features without forming streams.
Abstract
Aims. We will test the statistical significance of meteorite-dropping fireballs and NEA clustering using the DN similarity function based on four geocentric quantities (U, theta, phi, and lambda). Methods. We calculated the cumulative similarity found between 46 meteorite falls, 535 potential meteorite-dropping fireballs, 20,516 NEAs maintained by NEODyS-2, along with 34,836 NEAs maintained by NASA/JPL HORIZONS. Statistical significance was estimated by either: (1) Kernel Density Estimation-based method to estimate the sporadic background distribution to draw random samples, or (2) applying a uniform random solar longitude (lambda). Each comparison to the synthetic sporadic population is repeated to estimate the 3-sigma region for which the cumulative similarity distribution is consistent with random association levels. Results. The observed DN cumulative similarity distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
