A Moral Agency Framework for Legitimate Integration of AI in Bureaucracies
Chris Schmitz, Joanna Bryson

TL;DR
This paper proposes a moral agency framework for integrating AI into bureaucracies that emphasizes accountability, transparency, and legitimacy, aiming to prevent ethics sinks and enhance organizational trust.
Contribution
It introduces a novel three-point framework for ethically and effectively embedding AI in bureaucratic systems based on Weberian principles.
Findings
AI can enhance transparency and legitimacy in bureaucracies.
Design decisions influence the emergence of ethics sinks.
The framework supports responsible AI integration that maintains accountability.
Abstract
Public-sector bureaucracies seek to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), but face important concerns about accountability and transparency when using AI systems. In particular, perception or actuality of AI agency might create ethics sinks - constructs that facilitate dissipation of responsibility when AI systems of disputed moral status interface with bureaucratic structures. Here, we reject the notion that ethics sinks are a necessary consequence of introducing AI systems into bureaucracies. Rather, where they appear, they are the product of structural design decisions across both the technology and the institution deploying it. We support this claim via a systematic application of conceptions of moral agency in AI ethics to Weberian bureaucracy. We establish that it is both desirable and feasible to render AI systems as tools for the generation of organizational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
