Ultra-pure Nickel for Structural Components of Low-Radioactivity Instruments
T. J. Roosendaal, C. T. Overman, G. S. Ortega, T. D. Schlieder, N. D. Rocco, L. K. S. Horkley, K. P. Hobbs, K. Harouaka, J. L. Orrell, P. Acharya, A. Amy, E. Angelico, A. Anker, I. J. Arnquist, A. Atencio, J. Bane, V. Belov, E. P. Bernard, T. Bhatta, A. Bolotnikov, J. Breslin

TL;DR
This study evaluates chemical vapor deposition nickel as a promising ultra-low-radioactivity structural material for rare-event physics experiments, demonstrating its high strength and extremely low contaminant levels, with insights into welding effects and surface contamination.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive assessment of CVD nickel's mechanical properties and radioactive contamination levels, highlighting its potential for low-background physics applications.
Findings
CVD Ni has a tensile strength of ~600 MPa, surpassing standard nickel.
Welding reduces tensile strength to standard levels, with porosity likely causing this.
Measured radioactive contaminants are at record low levels in nickel.
Abstract
The next generation of rare-event search experiments in nuclear and particle physics demand structural materials combining exceptional mechanical strength with ultra-low levels of radioactive contamination. This study evaluates chemical vapor deposition (CVD) nickel as a candidate structural material for such applications. Manufacturer-supplied CVD Ni grown on aluminum substrates underwent tensile testing before and after welding alongside standard Ni samples. CVD Ni exhibited a planar tensile strength of ~600 MPa, significantly surpassing standard nickel. However, welding and heat treatment were found to reduce the tensile strength to levels comparable to standard Ni, with observed porosity in the welds likely contributing to this reduction. Material assay via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) employing isotope-dilution produced measured bulk concentration of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
