ProtoScan: Measuring censorship in IPv6
Jack Wampler, Hammas Bin Tanveer, Rishab Nithyanand, Eric Wustrow

TL;DR
This paper conducts a comprehensive global analysis comparing IPv6 and IPv4 censorship, revealing differences in censorship practices, capacities, and potential for circumvention in the evolving IPv6 landscape.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale comparison of IPv6 and IPv4 censorship, highlighting unique characteristics and vulnerabilities of IPv6 censorship systems.
Findings
IPv6 censorship differs significantly across countries.
Most censors can block IPv6 but are less effective than IPv4.
IPv6 offers new avenues for censorship circumvention.
Abstract
Internet censorship continues to impact billions of people worldwide, and measurement of it remains an important focus of research. However, most Internet censorship measurements have focused solely on the IPv4 Internet infrastructure. Yet, more clients and servers are available over IPv6: According to Google, over a third of their users now have native IPv6 access. Given the slow-but-steady rate of IPv6 adoption, it is important to understand its impact on censorship. In this paper, we measure and analyze how censorship differs over IPv6 compared to the well-studied IPv4 censorship systems in use today. We perform a comprehensive global study of censorship across an array of commonly censored protocols, including HTTP, DNS, and TLS, on both IPv4 and IPv6, and compare the results. We find that there are several differences in how countries censor IPv6 traffic, both in terms of IPv6…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · ICT in Developing Communities
