Benchmarking Self-Driving Labs
Adedire D. Adesiji, Jiashuo Wang, Cheng-Shu Kuo, Keith A. Brown

TL;DR
This paper reviews the progress and metrics in benchmarking self-driving labs, highlighting their ability to accelerate materials discovery by reducing experiments needed and analyzing factors influencing their efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces and discusses key metrics like AF and EF, and provides a comprehensive review of literature and simulations to understand SDL performance.
Findings
Median acceleration factor (AF) is 6, increasing with dimensionality.
EF varies widely but peaks at 10-20 experiments per dimension.
EF depends on parameter space properties, AF on complexity.
Abstract
A key goal of modern materials science is accelerating the pace of materials discovery. Self-driving labs, or systems that select experiments using machine learning and then execute them using automation, are designed to fulfil this promise by performing experiments faster, more intelligently, more reliably, and with richer metadata than conventional means. This review summarizes progress in understanding the degree to which SDLs accelerate learning by quantifying how much they reduce the number of experiments required for a given goal. The review begins by summarizing the theory underlying two key metrics, namely acceleration factor AF and enhancement factor EF, which quantify how much faster and better an algorithm is relative to a reference strategy. Next, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature, which reveals a wide range of AFs with a median of 6, and that tends to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
