InfoCausalQA:Can Models Perform Non-explicit Causal Reasoning Based on Infographic?
Keummin Ka, Junhyeong Park, Jaehyun Jeon, Youngjae Yu

TL;DR
This paper introduces InfoCausalQA, a benchmark for evaluating causal reasoning in vision-language models using infographics, revealing current models' limited capabilities in genuine causal inference compared to humans.
Contribution
The paper presents a new benchmark, InfoCausalQA, with a dataset and tasks designed to assess causal reasoning in multimodal models, highlighting their current limitations.
Findings
Current VLMs perform poorly on causal reasoning tasks.
Models show larger gaps in semantic causal reasoning compared to quantitative.
Humans significantly outperform models in causal inference tasks.
Abstract
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in perception and reasoning. However, the ability to perform causal inference -- a core aspect of human cognition -- remains underexplored, particularly in multimodal settings. In this study, we introduce InfoCausalQA, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate causal reasoning grounded in infographics that combine structured visual data with textual context. The benchmark comprises two tasks: Task 1 focuses on quantitative causal reasoning based on inferred numerical trends, while Task 2 targets semantic causal reasoning involving five types of causal relations: cause, effect, intervention, counterfactual, and temporal. We manually collected 494 infographic-text pairs from four public sources and used GPT-4o to generate 1,482 high-quality multiple-choice QA pairs. These questions were then carefully…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
