TL;DR
This study investigates whether multilingual large language models transfer political opinions across Western languages and how alignment techniques influence these opinions, revealing that opinions largely transfer with alignment shifting them uniformly.
Contribution
It provides the first analysis of cross-lingual political opinion transfer in MLLMs and evaluates the impact of alignment methods on these opinions across multiple Western languages.
Findings
Unaligned models show minimal cross-lingual differences in political opinions.
Alignment shifts opinions almost uniformly across all tested languages.
Political opinions tend to transfer between languages in Western language contexts.
Abstract
Public opinion surveys show cross-cultural differences in political opinions between socio-cultural contexts. However, there is no clear evidence whether these differences translate to cross-lingual differences in multilingual large language models (MLLMs). We analyze whether opinions transfer between languages or whether there are separate opinions for each language in MLLMs of various sizes across five Western languages. We evaluate MLLMs' opinions by prompting them to report their (dis)agreement with political statements from voting advice applications. To better understand the interaction between languages in the models, we evaluate them both before and after aligning them with more left or right views using direct preference optimization and English alignment data only. Our findings reveal that unaligned models show only very few significant cross-lingual differences in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
