Multivariate Partial Information Decomposition: Constructions, Inconsistencies, and Alternative Measures
Aobo Lyu, Andrew Clark, Netanel Raviv

TL;DR
This paper reviews the PID framework for multivariate information decomposition, resolves the two-source case, proves fundamental inconsistencies for three or more sources, and proposes alternative measures that address these issues.
Contribution
It provides explicit formulas for two-source PID, proves impossibility results for higher sources, and introduces new measures avoiding lattice-based inconsistencies.
Findings
Explicit formulas for two-source PID information atoms.
Fundamental inconsistency proofs for three or more sources.
New measures of multivariate unique and synergistic information.
Abstract
While mutual information effectively quantifies dependence between two variables, it does not by itself reveal the complex, fine-grained interactions among variables, i.e., how multiple sources contribute redundantly, uniquely, or synergistically to a target in multivariate settings. The Partial Information Decomposition (PID) framework was introduced to address this by decomposing the mutual information between a set of source variables and a target variable into fine-grained information atoms such as redundant, unique, and synergistic components. In this work, we review the axiomatic system and desired properties of the PID framework and make three main contributions. First, we resolve the two-source PID case by providing explicit closed-form formulas for all information atoms that satisfy the full set of axioms and desirable properties. Second, we prove that for three or more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
