Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension
Jianping Hu, Xuandong Jia, DaoHong Gao, Jiaze Gao, Baoquan Gao, Fayin Wang

TL;DR
This paper constrains the transition redshift using recent H(z) data and methods, revealing that methodology impacts results more than data, and suggests a link between the Hubble tension and a specific cosmic epoch.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how different methods and datasets influence transition redshift constraints and explores their relation to the Hubble tension.
Findings
Transition redshift mean value is 0.65 ± 0.16.
Method choice significantly affects redshift constraints.
The redshift coincides with the onset of H0 deviation from Planck values.
Abstract
The motivation of this paper is to obtain reliable constraints of transition redshift () and, in combination with the evolution of the Hubble constant () that could alleviate the Hubble tension, discuss the possible origin of the tension. Utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and different methods (CDM model, Cosmography, and Gaussian process method), we investigated the impact of methodology and dataset on constraints, and find that the choice of method has a greater impact on than the observations themselves. Through a statistical analysis of the constraints from 2004 to 2024, we find that total constraints (20042024) can be well described by a Gaussian function with the mean value 0.65 and the standard deviation 0.16; that is, (all) = 0.65 0.16. And we confirmed that both dataset and methodology…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
