Robots can defuse high-intensity conflict situations
Morten Roed Frederiksen, Kasper St{\o}y

TL;DR
This study explores how different affective expression modalities in robots can effectively defuse high-intensity conflicts with humans, highlighting that social awareness and appropriate reactions are key rather than specific expression modalities.
Contribution
It demonstrates that various affective expression modalities can successfully mitigate hostility in high-intensity human-robot conflicts, emphasizing the importance of social awareness over expression modality.
Findings
All tested modalities successfully defused conflict.
Movement modality differed significantly from others.
Participants perceived similar robot impact across modalities.
Abstract
This paper investigates the specific scenario of high-intensity confrontations between humans and robots, to understand how robots can defuse the conflict. It focuses on the effectiveness of using five different affective expression modalities as main drivers for defusing the conflict. The aim is to discover any strengths or weaknesses in using each modality to mitigate the hostility that people feel towards a poorly performing robot. The defusing of the situation is accomplished by making the robot better at acknowledging the conflict and by letting it express remorse. To facilitate the tests, we used a custom affective robot in a simulated conflict situation with 105 test participants. The results show that all tested expression modalities can successfully be used to defuse the situation and convey an acknowledgment of the confrontation. The ratings were remarkably similar, but the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
