A Novel Architecture for Symbolic Reasoning with Decision Trees and LLM Agents
Andrew Kiruluta

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hybrid neuro-symbolic architecture combining decision trees and large language models within a multi-agent framework to improve reasoning interpretability, accuracy, and domain applicability.
Contribution
It presents a novel integrated system that embeds decision trees as symbolic oracles within LLM-based reasoning, enabling interpretable and causal inference in a unified framework.
Findings
Improves entailment consistency on ProofWriter by +7.2%.
Achieves +5.3% accuracy on GSM8k multistep problems.
Boosts abstraction accuracy on ARC by +6.0%.
Abstract
We propose a hybrid architecture that integrates decision tree-based symbolic reasoning with the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) within a coordinated multi-agent framework. Unlike prior approaches that loosely couple symbolic and neural modules, our design embeds decision trees and random forests as callable oracles within a unified reasoning system. Tree-based modules enable interpretable rule inference and causal logic, while LLM agents handle abductive reasoning, generalization, and interactive planning. A central orchestrator maintains belief state consistency and mediates communication across agents and external tools, enabling reasoning over both structured and unstructured inputs. The system achieves strong performance on reasoning benchmarks. On \textit{ProofWriter}, it improves entailment consistency by +7.2\% through logic-grounded tree validation. On…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
