Plans for acceptance sampling by attributes when observations are destructive
Hugalf Bernburg, Katy Klauenberg

TL;DR
This paper critiques the ISO 2859-2 sampling plans for destructive testing, demonstrating their limitations with Bayesian analysis, and proposes new, risk-limited plans tailored for destructive sampling scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian-based approach to design destructive sampling plans that address the shortcomings of ISO 2859-2, including a new representation fixing remaining lot size.
Findings
ISO 2859-2 plans have high consumer's risk for small remaining lots
Bayesian plans better control risk in destructive sampling
Proposed representation simplifies future standardization
Abstract
The international standard ISO 2859-2 provides plans for acceptance sampling by attributes, that ensure a defined quality level in isolated lots using the hypergeometric distribution. In destructive testing, the sample itself is damaged or changed such that the quality of an entire lot is less relevant than the quality of the lot that remains after removing the sample. Examples include assessing the germination of seeds and the conformity of in-service utility meters. This research highlights that the hypergeometric distribution cannot describe the frequentist consumer's risk of accepting a remaining lot with unsatisfactory quality. Consequently, sampling plans as those provided in ISO 2859-2 are ill-suited to assess the remaining lot when sampling destructively. In contrast, Bayesian statistics inherently infers the lot's quality after sampling. Using a reference prior, we show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
