Superconducting gap symmetry of 2DEG at (111)-oriented LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ interface
J. Czarnecki, M. Zegrodnik, P. W\'ojcik

TL;DR
This study models the superconducting gap symmetry of a 2D electron gas at the (111) LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ interface, revealing how different pairing interactions influence the gap structure and potentially explain experimental observations.
Contribution
It introduces a multiorbital tight-binding model analyzing gap symmetry and pairing mechanisms, highlighting the role of intralayer next-nearest-neighbor pairing in superconductivity.
Findings
Superconducting gap transforms as $A_1$ irreducible representation.
Intralayer pairing produces a double-dome phase diagram.
Intralayer pairing may dominate the superconductivity at the interface.
Abstract
We investigate the superconducting properties of the two-dimensional electron gas at the (111) LaAlO/SrTiO interface. Using a multiorbital tight-binding model defined on a hexagonal lattice, we analyze the emergence of superconductivity driven by both interlayer (nearest-neighbor) and intralayer (next-nearest-neighbor) pairing interactions, with a particular focus on the symmetry of the superconducting gap. We demonstrate that, in both pairing scenarios, the superconducting gap transforms according to the irreducible representation of the point group. Within the interlayer pairing scenario, the superconducting phase is characterized by a fully gapped quasiparticle excitation spectrum exhibiting extended -wave symmetry, accompanied by an enhancement of the superconducting gap magnitude in the vicinity of the van Hove singularity. Conversely, the intralayer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
