Stringent constraint on the CCC+TL cosmology with $H(z)$ Measurements
Lei Lei (1,2), Ze-Fan Wang (1,2), Tong-Lin Wang (1,2), Yi-Ying Wang (1), Guan-Wen Yuan (3,4), Wei-Long Lin (1,2), Yi-Zhong Fan (1,2) ((1) Purple Mountain Observatory (2) University of Science

TL;DR
This study tests the CCC+TL cosmological model against $H(z)$ measurements and finds it strongly disfavored compared to $ m{ extbf{ extLambda}CDM}$, highlighting internal tensions and challenges in explaining high-redshift galaxy observations.
Contribution
It provides the first stringent observational constraint on the CCC+TL model using model-independent $H(z)$ data, revealing significant internal inconsistencies.
Findings
$ m{ extbf{ extLambda}CDM}$ fits $H(z)$ data well
CCC+TL model is strongly disfavored by $H(z)$ measurements
Internal tension in CCC+TL model with low likelihood ratio
Abstract
Recently, the Covarying Coupling Constants and Tired Light (CCC+TL) hybrid model was proposed to explain the unexpectedly small angular diameters of high-redshift galaxies observed by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) that are challenging to reconcile with the CDM model. In this work, we test the CCC+TL model against model-independent Hubble parameter [] measurements obtained from cosmic chronometers. It turns out that the parameter set optimized for the type-Ia supernova (SN Ia) dataset within the CCC+TL model fails to reproduce the data, but the CDM model works well. Statistical comparison using the strongly favors CDM over CCC+TL for the data, with . Crucially, the CCC+TL framework exhibits a severe internal tension, where the SN Ia-optimized speed-of-light variation index is rejected by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
