Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
Nihar B. Shah, Melisa Bok, Xukun Liu, Andrew McCallum

TL;DR
This paper uncovers cases of identity theft in AI conference peer review, exposing how researchers exploit reviewer systems and proposing strategies to enhance security and integrity in academic evaluations.
Contribution
It reveals the mechanisms of identity theft in peer review and introduces new safeguards to prevent such fraudulent activities in academic publishing.
Findings
Identification of methods used for identity theft in peer review
Evidence of manipulation in AI conference paper evaluations
Proposed strategies to strengthen reviewer verification processes
Abstract
We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research, with broader implications for other academic procedures. We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations, leveraging weaknesses in reviewer recruitment workflows and identity verification processes. The findings highlight the critical need for stronger safeguards against identity theft in peer review and academia at large, and to this end, we also propose mitigating strategies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
