The role of migration traps in the formation of binary black holes in AGN disks

TL;DR

This study investigates how migration traps influence the formation of binary black holes in AGN disks, revealing that their role varies with SMBH mass and disk properties, affecting gravitational-wave source predictions.

Contribution

The paper explicitly simulates black hole migration in AGN disks to assess the importance of migration traps versus differential migration in BBH formation.

Findings

Majority of pair-ups occur near migration traps for SMBH masses below 10^8 M_sun.

Off-trap pair-ups can dominate at higher SMBH masses due to differential migration.

Certain disk conditions lead to overdensities of pair-ups even without traps.

Abstract

Binary black holes (BBHs) forming in the accretion disks of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) represent a promising channel for gravitational-wave production. BBHs are often assumed to form at migration traps, i.e. radial locations where the Type I migration of embedded stellar-mass black holes (BHs) transitions from outwards to inwards. In this work, we test this assumption by explicitly simulating the radial migration of BH pairs in AGN disks under different torque prescriptions, including thermal effects and the switch to Type II migration. We map where and when binaries form as a function of supermassive BH (SMBH) mass, disk viscosity, and migrating BH mass. We find that, for SMBH masses below $10^8 M_\odot$, the majority of pair-up events occur near migration traps ($\gtrsim 80\%$). In contrast, for higher SMBH masses, differential migration dominates and off-trap pair-ups can prevail. Certain disk configurations (e.g., $\alpha = 0.01$, $M_\bullet < 10^6 M_\odot$) present a significant overdensity of pair-ups even in the absence of traps due to traffic-jam accumulations where the gamma profile changes slope sharply. We also investigate hierarchical BBH formation, showing that higher-generation pair-ups cluster more tightly around trap or traffic-jam radii. Our results provide realistic prescriptions for BBH pair-up locations and timescales, highlighting the limitations of assuming fixed BBH formation sites.