Beyond Meme Templates: Limitations of Visual Similarity Measures in Meme Matching
Muzhaffar Hazman, Susan McKeever, Josephine Griffith

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of current visual similarity measures in meme matching, especially for non-template memes, and explores new approaches including segment-wise similarity and prompting-based methods.
Contribution
It introduces a broader formulation of meme matching beyond template-based methods and evaluates novel similarity measures and multimodal prompting approaches.
Findings
Segment-wise similarity measures outperform whole-image measures on non-template memes.
Conventional similarity measures excel at template-based meme matching.
Accurately matching non-template memes remains an open challenge.
Abstract
Internet memes, now a staple of digital communication, play a pivotal role in how users engage within online communities and allow researchers to gain insight into contemporary digital culture. These engaging user-generated content are characterised by their reuse of visual elements also found in other memes. Matching instances of memes via these shared visual elements, called Meme Matching, is the basis of a wealth of meme analysis approaches. However, most existing methods assume that every meme consists of a shared visual background, called a Template, with some overlaid text, thereby limiting meme matching to comparing the background image alone. Current approaches exclude the many memes that are not template-based and limit the effectiveness of automated meme analysis and would not be effective at linking memes to contemporary web-based meme dictionaries. In this work, we introduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
