Roles of $a_0(980)$ and $a_0(1710)$ in Cabibbo-suppressed process $D^+\to \pi^0\pi^+\eta $
Xiao-Hui Zhang, Jing-Yu Zhu, Li-Juan Liu, and En Wang

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the $D^+ o \pi^0\pi^+\eta$ decay process, highlighting the roles of scalar mesons $a_0(980)$ and $a_0(1710)$, and successfully matches experimental data with theoretical models.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive theoretical model including $a_0(980)$, $ ho$, and $a_0(1710)$ contributions, clarifying their roles in the decay process and matching experimental invariant mass distributions.
Findings
The $a_0(980)$ can be dynamically generated from pseudoscalar interactions.
The $a_0(1710)$ is essential for explaining the structure around 1.6-1.7 GeV.
The model agrees well with BESIII measurements.
Abstract
Motivated by the BESIII amplitude analysis of the single Cabibbo-suppressed process , we investigate this reaction by taking into account the contributions from the , , and , where the scalar meson could be dynamically generated from the -wave pseudoscalar meson-pseudoscalar meson interaction within the chiral unitary approach. Our theoretical predictions for the , , and invariant mass distributions are in agreement with the BESIII measurements, especially the clear peaks around 1~GeV in the and invariant mass distributions could be associated with the dynamically generated state . Furthermore, we demonstrate that the intermediate is also necessary to describe the enhancement structure around ~GeV in the invariant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
