TL;DR
VideoGuard introduces a novel method to protect videos from unauthorized editing by applying subtle, optimized perturbations that disrupt generative diffusion models, leveraging joint frame optimization and motion information.
Contribution
The paper presents a new video protection technique that effectively defends against malicious editing by integrating inter-frame information and joint optimization, surpassing existing image-based methods.
Findings
VideoGuard significantly reduces unauthorized editing success.
The method outperforms baseline protection techniques.
Protection effectiveness is validated through both objective and subjective metrics.
Abstract
With the rapid development of generative technology, current generative models can generate high-fidelity digital content and edit it in a controlled manner. However, there is a risk that malicious individuals might misuse these capabilities for misleading activities. Although existing research has attempted to shield photographic images from being manipulated by generative models, there remains a significant disparity in the protection offered to video content editing. To bridge the gap, we propose a protection method named VideoGuard, which can effectively protect videos from unauthorized malicious editing. This protection is achieved through the subtle introduction of nearly unnoticeable perturbations that interfere with the functioning of the intended generative diffusion models. Due to the redundancy between video frames, and inter-frame attention mechanism in video diffusion…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
1. This work regards the video and its inversion as a whole, instead of using an image-based approach and processing it frame by frame. It's reasonable. 2. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the two-stage approach.
1. The experiments are insufficient and do not introduce enough baseline methods to prove the superiority of the proposed method. 2. Lack of test results on more video editing methods.
1. The proposed approach is interesting and reasonable to achieve the goal of protecting videos from unauthorized editing. 2. VideoGuard is to protect the video in the video pixel space, and the enhanced video is similar to the source video with extra shield. 3. The method treats the video as a whole without needing to process each frame individually.
My major concern is the results of VideoGuard. Although VideoGuard is a reasonable approach, seems the performance is not very effective. First of all, the video editing used seems not good. The edited videos are not very realistic from the examples shown in the paper. If the video editing method is not strong enough, it might be easy to protect the source video from effective editing. Second, the protection result of VideoGuard is not good. As shown in the second row of Fig.3, VideoGuard fai
This work represents the first attempt to prevent unauthorized manipulation of videos, paving the way for future research in this area.
**Novelty:** While this work is a pioneering attempt to counter unauthorized manipulation in video editing models, the proposed method demonstrates limited innovation. The two-stage learning approach lacks specific insights tailored to this task. Specifically, in both stage 1 and 2, the authors apply PGD to learn the perturbated latent code and protedcted videos. However, PGD is published in 2018, which is outdated. I suggest the authors to customize a new temporal attack method for the task.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
