Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets
Oriol Saguillo, Vahid Ghafouri, Lucianna Kiffer, Guillermo Suarez-Tangil

TL;DR
This paper empirically investigates arbitrage opportunities in Polymarket prediction markets, revealing two main types of arbitrage and estimating a total profit of around 40 million USD exploited by users.
Contribution
It introduces a scalable heuristic method for detecting arbitrage across related prediction markets and provides the first empirical analysis of arbitrage behavior on Polymarket.
Findings
Identified two types of arbitrage: market rebalancing and combinatorial.
Estimated $40 million USD profit from arbitrage activities.
Confirmed arbitrage opportunities are actively exploited by users.
Abstract
Polymarket is a prediction market platform where users can speculate on future events by trading shares tied to specific outcomes, known as conditions. Each market is associated with a set of one or more such conditions. To ensure proper market resolution, the condition set must be exhaustive -- collectively accounting for all possible outcomes -- and mutually exclusive -- only one condition may resolve as true. Thus, the collective prices of all related outcomes should be $1, representing a combined probability of 1 of any outcome. Despite this design, Polymarket exhibits cases where dependent assets are mispriced, allowing for purchasing (or selling) a certain outcome for less than (or more than) $1, guaranteeing profit. This phenomenon, known as arbitrage, could enable sophisticated participants to exploit such inconsistencies. In this paper, we conduct an empirical arbitrage…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
