Evaluating the Predictive Value of Preoperative MRI for Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Gideon N. L. Rouwendaal, Dani\"el Boeke, Inge L. Cox, Henk G. van der Poel, Margriet C. van Dijk-de Haan, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Thierry N. Boellaard, Wilson Silva

TL;DR
This study assesses whether preoperative MRI adds predictive value for erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy, finding that clinical features outperform MRI-based models, but imaging may still provide complementary insights.
Contribution
It compares multiple modeling strategies, including deep learning and multimodal fusion, to evaluate MRI's role in predicting post-surgical erectile dysfunction.
Findings
MRI models slightly outperform anatomical features
Clinical features outperform MRI-based models
Fusion models offer marginal improvements
Abstract
Accurate preoperative prediction of erectile dysfunction (ED) is important for counseling patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. While clinical features are established predictors, the added value of preoperative MRI remains underexplored. We investigate whether MRI provides additional predictive value for ED at 12 months post-surgery, evaluating four modeling strategies: (1) a clinical-only baseline, representing current state-of-the-art; (2) classical models using handcrafted anatomical features derived from MRI; (3) deep learning models trained directly on MRI slices; and (4) multimodal fusion of imaging and clinical inputs. Imaging-based models (maximum AUC 0.569) slightly outperformed handcrafted anatomical approaches (AUC 0.554) but fell short of the clinical baseline (AUC 0.663). Fusion models offered marginal gains (AUC 0.586) but did not exceed clinical-only performance.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
