Cropping outperforms dropout as an augmentation strategy for self-supervised training of text embeddings
Rita Gonz\'alez-M\'arquez, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that cropping augmentation significantly outperforms dropout in self-supervised fine-tuning of text embeddings, leading to higher quality representations especially for in-domain data.
Contribution
The study systematically compares cropping and dropout augmentation strategies, revealing cropping's superior effectiveness in self-supervised text embedding fine-tuning.
Findings
Cropping augmentation outperforms dropout in embedding quality.
Self-supervised fine-tuning yields high-quality in-domain embeddings after short training.
Embedding quality improves in the last transformer layers during fine-tuning.
Abstract
Text embeddings, i.e. vector representations of entire texts, play an important role in many NLP applications, such as retrieval-augmented generation, clustering, or visualizing collections of texts for data exploration. Currently, top-performing embedding models are derived from pre-trained language models via supervised contrastive fine-tuning. This fine-tuning strategy relies on an external notion of similarity and annotated data for generation of positive pairs. Here we study self-supervised fine-tuning and systematically compare the two most well-known augmentation strategies used for fine-tuning text embeddings models. We assess embedding quality on MTEB and additional in-domain evaluations and show that cropping augmentation strongly outperforms the dropout-based approach. We find that on out-of-domain data, the quality of resulting embeddings is substantially below the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
