Coordinate-independent model reductions of chemical reaction networks based on geometric singular perturbation theory
Timothy Earl Figueroa Lapuz, Martin Wechselberger

TL;DR
This paper introduces a coordinate-independent reduction method for chemical reaction networks using geometric singular perturbation theory, enabling systematic and robust model simplification across various parameter regimes without relying on timescale separation.
Contribution
The authors develop a novel reduction framework based on geometric singular perturbation theory that is independent of coordinate choices and applicable even without clear timescale separation.
Findings
Systematic reduction of Michaelis-Menten reaction across multiple parameter regimes
Successful reduction of complex Kim-Forger model without coordinate transformation
Comparison with traditional QSSA methods highlights advantages of the new approach
Abstract
The quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA) is a standard technique for reducing the complexity of chemical reaction networks (CRNs). The validity of any QSSA-based model is restricted to specific parameter regimes. Selecting the appropriate reduction is not always straightforward. At times, QSSAs are misused outside of their validity regions and, even when a particular QSSA is considered valid in a given parameter regime, other QSSAs may be simultaneously valid, creating ambiguity. Here, we employ a more powerful alternative: a constructive model reduction framework based on coordinate-independent geometric singular perturbation theory (ci-GSPT) and the parametrization method. A key advantage of this approach is its ability to derive reduced models independent of a clear timescale separation in the variables for a specific parameter configuration. We demonstrate our approach on two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
