Enhancing Joint Human-AI Inference in Robot Missions: A Confidence-Based Approach
Duc-An Nguyen, Clara Colombatto, Steve Fleming, Ingmar Posner, Nick Hawes, Raunak Bhattacharyya

TL;DR
This paper introduces a confidence-based method for joint human-AI inference in robot missions, demonstrating improved accuracy and the importance of well-calibrated AI confidence for effective human-AI collaboration.
Contribution
It presents the first application of a maximum-confidence heuristic for joint inference in robot teleoperation, highlighting the impact of AI confidence calibration on performance.
Findings
Joint inference accuracy improves with better AI confidence calibration.
Humans adapt their inferences based on AI recommendations and confidence levels.
Poorly calibrated AI systems can harm team performance.
Abstract
Joint human-AI inference holds immense potential to improve outcomes in human-supervised robot missions. Current day missions are generally in the AI-assisted setting, where the human operator makes the final inference based on the AI recommendation. However, due to failures in human judgement on when to accept or reject the AI recommendation, complementarity is rarely achieved. We investigate joint human-AI inference where the inference made with higher confidence is selected. Through a user study with N=100 participants on a representative simulated robot teleoperation task, specifically studying the inference of robots' control delays we show that: a) Joint inference accuracy is higher and its extent is regulated by the confidence calibration of the AI agent, and b) Humans change their inferences based on AI recommendations and the extent and direction of this change is also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
