Teaching at Scale: Leveraging AI to Evaluate and Elevate Engineering Education
Jean-Francois Chamberland, Martin C. Carlisle, Arul Jayaraman, Krishna R. Narayanan, Sunay Palsole, Karan Watson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable AI framework using large language models to analyze and synthesize qualitative student feedback for large engineering programs, enabling effective teaching evaluation at scale.
Contribution
It presents a novel AI-supported system that automates qualitative feedback analysis with ethical safeguards, hierarchical summarization, and visual analytics, tailored for large-scale engineering education.
Findings
AI summaries reliably support formative evaluation.
System deployed successfully across a large engineering college.
Preliminary validation shows alignment with human review.
Abstract
Evaluating teaching effectiveness at scale remains a persistent challenge for large universities, particularly within engineering programs that enroll tens of thousands of students. Traditional methods, such as manual review of student evaluations, are often impractical, leading to overlooked insights and inconsistent data use. This article presents a scalable, AI-supported framework for synthesizing qualitative student feedback using large language models. The system employs hierarchical summarization, anonymization, and exception handling to extract actionable themes from open-ended comments while upholding ethical safeguards. Visual analytics contextualize numeric scores through percentile-based comparisons, historical trends, and instructional load. The approach supports meaningful evaluation and aligns with best practices in qualitative analysis and educational assessment,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
