A difference-in-differences estimator by covariate balancing propensity score
Junjie Li, Yukitoshi Matsushita

TL;DR
This paper introduces a covariate balancing propensity score method for difference-in-differences analysis, offering improved efficiency, robustness, and convergence properties for estimating treatment effects on the treated in panel data.
Contribution
It develops a novel CBPS DID estimator with theoretical advantages over existing methods, including double robustness and faster convergence.
Findings
Demonstrates superior finite sample performance in simulations
Shows theoretical double robustness and local efficiency
Outperforms AIPW DID estimators in convergence speed
Abstract
This article develops a covariate balancing approach for the estimation of treatment effects on the treated (ATT) in a difference-in-differences (DID) research design when panel data are available. We show that the proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) DID estimator possesses several desirable properties: (i) local efficiency, (ii) double robustness in terms of consistency, (iii) double robustness in terms of inference, and (iv) faster convergence to the ATT compared to the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) DID estimators when both working models are locally misspecified. These latter two characteristics set the CBPS DID estimator apart from the AIPW DID estimator theoretically. Simulation studies and an empirical study demonstrate the desirable finite sample performance of the proposed estimator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
