From Binary to Continuous: Stochastic Re-Weighting for Robust Graph Explanation
Zhuomin Chen, Jingchao Ni, Hojat Allah Salehi, Xu Zheng, Dongsheng Luo

TL;DR
This paper introduces an iterative explanation framework for GNNs that aligns training and explanation data distributions through model adaptation, enhancing explanation robustness and quality across various datasets and architectures.
Contribution
It proposes a novel iterative method that refines explanations by alternating between subgraph identification and model retraining on importance-weighted graphs, addressing distributional shift issues.
Findings
Improves explanation quality across multiple benchmarks
Enhances robustness of explanations for small, sparse subgraphs
Compatible with various GNN architectures and explanation methods
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable performance in a wide range of graph-related learning tasks. However, explaining their predictions remains a challenging problem, especially due to the mismatch between the graphs used during training and those encountered during explanation. Most existing methods optimize soft edge masks on weighted graphs to highlight important substructures, but these graphs differ from the unweighted graphs on which GNNs are trained. This distributional shift leads to unreliable gradients and degraded explanation quality, especially when generating small, sparse subgraphs. To address this issue, we propose a novel iterative explanation framework which improves explanation robustness by aligning the model's training data distribution with the weighted graph distribution appeared during explanation. Our method alternates between two phases:…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
S1. The paper addresses an important flaw in GNN explanation methods. The distributional shift between binary training graphs and weighted explanation graphs is a critical vulnerability. S2. The paper provides a clear empirical diagnosis of the problem S3. The experimental validation improves the performance (AUC-ROC) of five different baseline explainers (e.g., GNNExplainer, PGExplainer) across five benchmark datasets.
W1. The iterative framework, by design, introduces a significant computational cost. The method requires $L$ rounds of both GNN retraining (on augmented weighted graphs) and explainer retraining. This is a substantial increase in computation compared to a standard, one-shot post-hoc explanation method. W2. The STORE framework introduces several new hyperparameters that require careful tuning. W3. Dependence on Initial Explainer: The iterative process is seeded by an initial explanation ($\Ps
This paper proposes a novel iterative stochastic re-weighting explanation framework to enhance the explanation of Graph Neural Networks. Comprehensive experiments have been conducted on GCN and GIN models and demonstrate consistent improvements in explanation performance and reliability. In addition, the paper provides theoretical foundations to support the proposed framework.
W1. In Section 5, the theorem provides a justification for the iterative framework, but the paper lacks sufficient analysis of the effectiveness and theoretical soundness of the stochastic re-weighting strategy. W2. The proposed framework emphasizes graph weight tuning more than previous methods, which significantly expands the weight search space and makes the approach appear more engineering-oriented rather than theoretically innovative. W3. The baseline performance results reported in the p
The paper addresses an interesting research topic, handling out-of-distribution (OOD) issues in explanatory graphs, which has emerged as one of the most actively researched areas in the Graph XAI field.
1. Pre-trained GNNs should be treated as fixed targets for explanation. However, since the proposed method re-trains the target model to address the OOD explanatory graphs problem, the resulting explanations cannot be considered explanations of the original pre-trained GNN. 2. The approach requires retraining a pre-trained GNN, which represents a highly restrictive setting with limited feasibility in real-world applications where models need to remain fixed. 3. When the explanation fails to capt
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Healthcare
