Positivity and $\mathbf{L^2}$ Extension
Dror Varolin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the link between vector bundle positivity and $L^2$ extension problems for holomorphic forms, showing Griffiths positivity is insufficient and providing new proofs for Nakano positivity's sufficiency.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Griffiths positivity alone does not guarantee $L^2$ extension, and offers a novel proof of Nakano positivity's sufficiency using a vector bundle analogue of Berndtsson's result.
Findings
Griffiths positivity is not enough for $L^2$ extension.
Nakano positivity guarantees $L^2$ extension, with a new proof provided.
Established a vector bundle analogue of Berndtsson's theorem.
Abstract
We examine the relationship between positivity of a vector bundle E and the problem of extension of holomorphic E-valued forms of top degree. In particular, we show by example that Griffiths positivity is not enough. Though the sufficiency of Nakano positivity of E has been known for some time, we provide another proof along the lines of Berndtsson and Lempert. For such a proof we establish a vector bundle analogue of a well-known result of Berndtsson. This result is of independent interest and should have many other useful applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Holomorphic and Operator Theory
