Oldie but Goodie: Re-illuminating Label Propagation on Graphs with Partially Observed Features
Sukwon Yun, Xin Liu, Yunhak Oh, Junseok Lee, Tianlong Chen, Tsuyoshi Murata, Chanyoung Park

TL;DR
This paper introduces GOODIE, a hybrid framework combining Label Propagation and Feature Propagation with attention and contrastive learning, to improve node classification on graphs with missing features, outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
It presents a novel hybrid approach with a GNN-based decoder, Structure-Feature Attention, and pseudo-label contrastive learning for better performance with partial features.
Findings
GOODIE outperforms state-of-the-art methods with limited features.
GOODIE performs well even with abundant features.
The proposed model effectively leverages structure and feature information.
Abstract
In real-world graphs, we often encounter missing feature situations where a few or the majority of node features, e.g., sensitive information, are missed. In such scenarios, directly utilizing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) would yield sub-optimal results in downstream tasks such as node classification. Despite the emergence of a few GNN-based methods attempting to mitigate its missing situation, when only a few features are available, they rather perform worse than traditional structure-based models. To this end, we propose a novel framework that further illuminates the potential of classical Label Propagation (Oldie), taking advantage of Feature Propagation, especially when only a partial feature is available. Now called by GOODIE, it takes a hybrid approach to obtain embeddings from the Label Propagation branch and Feature Propagation branch. To do so, we first design a GNN-based…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn Submission
* Significance: Addressing the missing data problem is important. * Presentation: Overall, this paper is well-written.
* Misrepresentation of Information: Stating that the outputs of the LP branch and the FP branch represent structural information and feature information is inaccurate. The LP branch utilizes class/label information, while the FP branch leverages feature information, and both branches rely on structural information through the propagation process. * Only Node Classification: Goodie is limited to addressing only node classification, which restricts its applications. * Marginal Performance Gains:
1. Some specific designs in the proposed method is interesting. Specifically: 1. The structure-feature attention is useful in combining the results of feature and label propagation; 2. The fine-grained consideration of pseudo label is practical. 2. The idea of balancing the contribution of structure and feature information makes sense, especially when the missing situation is unknown or uncertain.
1. The idea of combining feature propagation and label propagation is not innovative enough. Previous papers [*1,*2] also consider similar idea. [*1] Wang, Yangkun, et al. "Why propagate alone? parallel use of labels and features on graphs." arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07190 (2021). [*2] Shi, Yunsheng, et al. "Masked label prediction: Unified message passing model for semi-supervised classification." arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03509 (2020). 2. Key baselines lack. There are some GNNs that are also
1. The paper is generally well-written and easy to understand. 2. Both large-scale and small datasets are utilized to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. 3. Ablation studies are conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed components.
1. The novelty of the proposed model is only incremental, as it simply combines label propagation and feature propagation with attention mechanism. There are no new modules in the LP and FP branches. The contrastive learning module is also from SupCon. 2. The experiments are only conducted on homophily graphs, and it is not clear how it will perform on heterophily graphs. 3. The performance improvement is only marginal, and the authors did not explain why their model does not work on Coauthor
+ The method combines two fundamental parameter-free graph method and achieves incremental performance. + The proposed model is well presented and easy to follow. + Detailed studies on the model performance w.r.t. different feature missing settings.
- The proposed Goodie appears to be a rather straightforward fusion of existing label and feature propagation models. - The introduced contrastive learning loss provides limited improvement according to the ablation study in Appendix B. - The performance of Goodie is merely compared with several basic baseline methods that were proposed before 2021. It seems that the performance of Goodie is grounded by the LP and FP model, yet fails to make any significant improvement over on them. - Several ty
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Text and Document Classification Technologies · Topic Modeling
