Stakeholder Perspectives on Digital Twin Implementation Challenges in Healthcare: Insights from a Provider Digital Twin Case Study
Md Doulotuzzaman Xames, Taylan G. Topcu

TL;DR
This study explores the diverse challenges faced by different healthcare stakeholders in implementing digital twin technology, emphasizing the need for tailored, multidisciplinary strategies to facilitate successful adoption.
Contribution
It provides a detailed stakeholder perspective analysis on digital twin implementation challenges in healthcare using a comprehensive case study and thematic coding.
Findings
Shared concerns include data privacy, security, and regulatory compliance.
Diverging stakeholder perspectives highlight specific functional and practical barriers.
66 challenges categorized into seven key domains.
Abstract
Digital twin (DT) technology holds immense potential for transforming healthcare systems through real-time monitoring, predictive analysis, and agile interventions to support various decision-making needs. However, its successful implementation depends on addressing a range of complex sociotechnical challenges. Using a case study of provider workload DT, this research investigates DT implementation challenges in healthcare by capturing the perspectives of four distinct stakeholders: family medicine specialists (FMS), organizational psychologists (OP), engineers (EE), and implementation scientists (IS). We conducted semi-structured interviews guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0), a widely used implementation science framework for understanding factors that influence implementation outcomes. We then mapped each stakeholder group's preferences…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Transformation in Industry · Health Policy Implementation Science · Educational Leadership and Innovation
