Toward Responsible and Beneficial AI: Comparing Regulatory and Guidance-Based Approaches -A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Governance Frameworks across the European Union, United States, China, and IEEE
Jian Du

TL;DR
This paper compares AI governance frameworks from the EU, US, China, and IEEE, analyzing their approaches to responsible AI development through qualitative content analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of different AI governance models across major jurisdictions and organizations.
Findings
Distinctive regulatory philosophies identified
Implementation mechanisms vary significantly
Global engagement strategies differ across frameworks
Abstract
This dissertation presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of artificial intelligence governance frameworks across the European Union, United States, China, and IEEE technical standards, examining how different jurisdictions and organizations approach the challenge of promoting responsible and beneficial AI development. Using a qualitative research design based on systematic content analysis, the study identifies distinctive patterns in regulatory philosophy, implementation mechanisms, and global engagement strategies across these major AI governance ecosystems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLegal and Policy Issues · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
