Non-Terrestrial Network Models Using Stochastic Geometry: Planar or Spherical?

TL;DR

This paper evaluates the accuracy of planar versus spherical stochastic geometry models for non-terrestrial networks, providing error quantification methods and guidelines for when planar models are sufficient.

Contribution

It introduces a relative error metric and an algorithm to compare planar and spherical models, along with an analytical expression for optimal planar altitude.

Findings

Planar models are accurate at lower altitudes.

Spherical models are necessary for high-altitude NTN analysis.

Guidelines for model selection based on deployment parameters.

Abstract

With the explosive deployment of non-terrestrial networks (NTNs), the computational complexity of network performance analysis is rapidly escalating. As one of the most suitable mathematical tools for analyzing large-scale network topologies, stochastic geometry (SG) enables the representation of network performance metrics as functions of network parameters, thus offering low-complexity performance analysis solutions. However, choosing between planar and spherical models remains challenging. Planar models neglect Earth's curvature, causing deviations in high-altitude NTN analysis, yet are still often used for simplicity. This paper introduces relative error to quantify the gap between planar and spherical models, helping determine when planar modeling is sufficient. To calculate the relative error, we first propose a point process (PP) generation algorithm that simultaneously generates a pair of homogeneous and asymptotically similar planar and spherical PPs. We then introduce several typical similarity metrics, including topology-related and network-level metrics, and further develop a relative error estimation algorithm based on these metrics. In addition, we derive an analytical expression for the optimal planar altitude, which reduces computational complexity and provides theoretical support for planar approximation. Finally, numerical results investigate how deployment altitude and region affect NTN modeling, with case studies on HAP and LEO satellite constellations.