A Statistical Physics perspective on fairness in shared expenses: The bar bill analogy
Nuno Crokidakis, Lucas Sigaud

TL;DR
This paper applies statistical physics principles to explain the surprising fairness of equal expense sharing in social groups, modeling individual consumption as stochastic variables and deriving analytical results that show fairness emerges from collective behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a statistical physics framework using gamma distributions and Boltzmann-like weighting to analytically explain fairness in shared expenses, bridging social behavior and thermodynamics.
Findings
Analytical expressions for consumption distribution and entropy derived.
Numerical simulations confirm the theoretical predictions.
Equal sharing emerges as a robust statistical outcome due to collective effects.
Abstract
In social contexts where individuals consume varying amounts, such as shared meals or bar gatherings, splitting the total bill equally often yields surprisingly fair outcomes. In this work, we develop a statistical physics framework to explain this emergent fairness by modeling individual consumption as stochastic variables drawn from a realistic distribution, specifically the gamma distribution. Introducing a Boltzmann-like weighting factor, we derive exact analytical expressions for the partition function, average consumption, variance, and entropy under economic or social penalization constraints. Numerical simulations, performed using the Marsaglia-Tsang algorithm, confirm the analytical results with high precision. Drawing a direct parallel between individual consumption and ideal gas particle energy in the canonical ensemble, we show how the law of large numbers, mutual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
