Factors controlling protein evolvability, at the molecular scale

TL;DR

This paper investigates how epistasis and the principle of least action influence protein evolution, suggesting that molecular evolution may be more predictable than previously thought due to these constraints.

Contribution

It introduces a framework combining epistasis and least action principles to better understand and predict protein evolutionary paths at the molecular level.

Findings

Epistasis constrains protein evolutionary trajectories.

Least action principle helps identify the most efficient evolutionary paths.

Protein evolvability may be more predictable than previously assumed.

Abstract

This piece serves two purposes. Firstly, it aims at elucidating the role of epistasis in shaping, at a molecular level, the evolutionary paths of proteins, as well as the extent to which these epistatic effects are the outcome of an as-yet-unidentified epistatic force. Second, it seeks to ascertain the extent to which the principle of least action will enable us to identify which of all potential trajectories has the highest evolutionary efficiency, as well as how variations in factors such as protein robustness and folding rates, resulting from the unavoidability of destabilizing mutations, might influence this critical evolutionary process. The initial findings suggest that protein evolution, at a molecular level, may be more predictable than previously thought, as epistasis and the principle of least action collectively impose constraints on evolutionary paths and trajectories, and consequently, on protein evolvability. Thus, this work should advance our understanding of the main molecular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of mutation-driven proteins and also provide grounds to answer a fundamental evolutionary question: how does Darwinian selection regard all potential trajectories available?