DSBC : Data Science task Benchmarking with Context engineering
Ram Mohan Rao Kadiyala, Siddhant Gupta, Jebish Purbey, Giulio Martini, Ali Shafique, Suman Debnath, Hamza Farooq

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating data science agents powered by large language models, focusing on real-world interactions, diverse tasks, and sensitivity to prompting issues, to guide future improvements.
Contribution
It presents a novel benchmark dataset and evaluation framework for assessing LLM-based data science agents in practical scenarios, addressing a gap in systematic evaluation tools.
Findings
Distinct performance disparities among models and approaches
Model sensitivity to prompting issues like data leakage and ambiguity
Influence of temperature settings on task outcomes
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly impacted data science workflows, giving rise to specialized data science agents designed to automate analytical tasks. Despite rapid adoption, systematic benchmarks evaluating the efficacy and limitations of these agents remain scarce. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark specifically crafted to reflect real-world user interactions with data science agents by observing usage of our commercial applications. We evaluate three LLMs: Claude-4.0-Sonnet, Gemini-2.5-Flash, and OpenAI-o4-Mini across three approaches: zero-shot with context engineering, multi-step with context engineering, and with SmolAgent. Our benchmark assesses performance across a diverse set of eight data science task categories, additionally exploring the sensitivity of models to common prompting issues, such as data leakage and slightly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Data Quality and Management
