Investigating the Invertibility of Multimodal Latent Spaces: Limitations of Optimization-Based Methods
Siwoo Park

TL;DR
This paper explores the limitations of using optimization-based methods to perform inverse mappings in multimodal latent spaces, revealing that these spaces lack the structure needed for meaningful and coherent inverse tasks.
Contribution
It introduces an optimization framework to test inverse capabilities of multimodal latent spaces and demonstrates their limitations in producing semantically meaningful reconstructions.
Findings
Optimization can produce textually aligned outputs.
Perceptual quality of inversions is chaotic and incoherent.
Latent space embeddings often lack semantic interpretability.
Abstract
This paper investigates the inverse capabilities and broader utility of multimodal latent spaces within task-specific AI (Artificial Intelligence) models. While these models excel at their designed forward tasks (e.g., text-to-image generation, audio-to-text transcription), their potential for inverse mappings remains largely unexplored. We propose an optimization-based framework to infer input characteristics from desired outputs, applying it bidirectionally across Text-Image (BLIP, Flux.1-dev) and Text-Audio (Whisper-Large-V3, Chatterbox-TTS) modalities. Our central hypothesis posits that while optimization can guide models towards inverse tasks, their multimodal latent spaces will not consistently support semantically meaningful and perceptually coherent inverse mappings. Experimental results consistently validate this hypothesis. We demonstrate that while optimization can force…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and dialogue systems · Natural Language Processing Techniques
