Non-classicality at equilibrium and efficient predictions under non-commuting charges
Lodovico Scarpa, Nishan Ranabhat, Amit Te'eni, Abdulla Alhajri, Vlatko Vedral, Fabio Anza, Luis Pedro Garc\'ia-Pintos

TL;DR
This paper explores how non-commuting charges affect quantum system equilibration, revealing that weak values and quasiprobabilities can characterize non-classical equilibrium features without needing detailed spectral information.
Contribution
It extends observable-dependent equilibration methods to non-commuting charges, enabling efficient predictions of equilibrium distributions without spectral data or weak coupling assumptions.
Findings
Weak values can be anomalous at equilibrium due to non-commuting charges.
The approach accurately estimates equilibrium distributions without spectral information.
Reveals a connection between non-commutativity, weak values, and quasiprobability distributions.
Abstract
A quantum thermodynamic system can conserve non-commuting observables, but the consequences of this phenomenon on relaxation are still not fully understood. We investigate this problem by leveraging an observable-dependent approach to equilibration and thermalization in isolated quantum systems. We extend such approach to scenarios with non-commuting charges, and show that it can accurately estimate the equilibrium distribution of coarse observables without access to the energy eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Our predictions do not require weak coupling and are not restricted to local observables, thus providing an advantage over the non-Abelian thermal state. Within this approach, weak values and quasiprobability distributions emerge naturally and play a crucial role in characterizing the equilibrium distributions of observables. We show and numerically confirm that, due to charges'…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
