Consistency of Feature Attribution in Deep Learning Architectures for Multi-Omics
Daniel Claborne, Javier Flores, Samantha Erwin, Luke Durell, Rachel Richardson, Ruby Fore, Lisa Bramer

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the consistency and robustness of SHAP feature attribution in multi-view deep learning models for multi-omics data, revealing sensitivity to architecture and initialization, and proposing a new assessment method.
Contribution
It systematically assesses SHAP's reliability in multi-omics deep learning models and introduces a simple method to evaluate biomolecule identification robustness.
Findings
SHAP rankings vary with model architecture and initialization.
Attribution methods show sensitivity, requiring cautious interpretation.
Proposed a new method to assess biomolecule identification robustness.
Abstract
Machine and deep learning have grown in popularity and use in biological research over the last decade but still present challenges in interpretability of the fitted model. The development and use of metrics to determine features driving predictions and increase model interpretability continues to be an open area of research. We investigate the use of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) on a multi-view deep learning model applied to multi-omics data for the purposes of identifying biomolecules of interest. Rankings of features via these attribution methods are compared across various architectures to evaluate consistency of the method. We perform multiple computational experiments to assess the robustness of SHAP and investigate modeling approaches and diagnostics to increase and measure the reliability of the identification of important features. Accuracy of a random-forest model fit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
