All-polarisation beamsplitters for interferometer applications
S.L. Kranzhoff, Z. Van Ranst, J. De Bolle, S. Coessens, S.L. Danilishin, C. Detavernier, P.F. Smet, A.P. Spencer, J. Steinlechner, S. Steinlechner, M. Vardaro, S. Hild

TL;DR
This paper compares two polarisation beamsplitter coatings designed for interferometers, analyzing their optical properties and phase shifts to improve polarisation-based measurement schemes in gravitational-wave detectors.
Contribution
It presents a comparative analysis of two different coating strategies for polarisation beamsplitters, highlighting their optical performance and phase shift characteristics.
Findings
Laseroptik coating achieves 51% reflectivity with zero phase difference.
Optoman coating has nearly equal reflectivity for s- and p-polarisations with a small phase shift.
Both coatings meet specific requirements for interferometer applications.
Abstract
Optical beamsplitters with similar properties for orthogonal, linear polarisation modes are required for realising polarisation-based speedmeter schemes to reduce back-action noise in gravitational-wave interferometers. In this paper, we investigate two beamsplitter coatings obtained from Laseroptik GmbH and Optoman on a best-effort basis that aim for a 50/50 power splitting ratio and equal overall phase shift for two orthogonal, linear polarisation modes interacting with the optic. We show that while Laseroptik GmbH opted for coating stack with 22 alternating layers of Ta2O5 and SiO2, Optoman produced a much thinner coating made of 5 SiO2 and SiOx (0 < x < 2) layers. With these strategies, the Laseroptik coating achieves an equal power reflectivity of 51% at 46 deg angle of incidence, and zero phase shift between both polarisations at 44.25 deg angle of incidence. The Optoman coating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
