Helmholtz boundary integral methods and the pollution effect
Jeffrey Galkowski, Manas Rachh, Euan A. Spence

TL;DR
This paper analyzes boundary integral methods for high-frequency Helmholtz problems, establishing how the degrees of freedom must grow with wavenumber and identifying which methods are affected by the pollution effect.
Contribution
It provides rigorous results on the growth of degrees of freedom needed for accuracy and identifies methods susceptible to the pollution effect in high-frequency Helmholtz boundary problems.
Findings
Determines the rate at which degrees of freedom must increase with wavenumber
Identifies which boundary integral methods suffer from the pollution effect
Provides first rigorous analysis for certain Galerkin and collocation methods
Abstract
This paper is concerned with solving the Helmholtz exterior Dirichlet and Neumann problems with large wavenumber and smooth obstacles using the standard second-kind boundary integral equations. We consider Galerkin and collocation methods -- with subspaces consisting of piecewise polynomials (in 2-d for collocation, in any dimension for Galerkin) trigonometric polynomials (in 2-d) -- as well as a fully discrete quadrature (Nystr\"om) method based on trigonometric polynomials (in 2-d). For each of these methods, we prove -- in many cases for the first time -- rigorous results about the fundamental question: how quickly must the number of degrees of freedom (the dimension of the approximation space) grow with to maintain accuracy of the computed solution? Importantly, we determine which of these methods suffer from .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
