Euclid: Forecasts on $\Lambda$CDM consistency tests with growth rate data
I. Ocampo (1), D. Sapone (2), S. Nesseris (1), G. Alestas (1), J. Garc\'ia-Bellido (1), Z. Sakr (3, 4, 5), C. J. A. P. Martins (6, 7), J. P. Mimoso (8, 9), A. Carvalho (8, 9), A. Da Silva (8, 9), A. Blanchard (4), S. Casas (10), S. Camera (11, 12, 13), M. Martinelli (14, 15)

TL;DR
This paper assesses Euclid's potential to improve constraints on deviations from the $$CDM model using growth rate data, employing binning and machine learning methods to enhance null test sensitivity.
Contribution
It introduces a combined analysis of Euclid and other survey data, applying novel binning and genetic algorithm techniques to better detect deviations from $$CDM.
Findings
Euclid will significantly improve null test constraints by a factor of 6 to 8.
Combining Euclid with other surveys enhances the detection of deviations.
Statistical methods like genetic algorithms are effective in disentangling parameter degeneracies.
Abstract
The large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe is an important probe for deviations from the canonical cosmological constant and cold dark matter (CDM) model. A statistically significant detection of any deviations would signify the presence of new physics or the breakdown of any number of the underlying assumptions of the standard cosmological model or possible systematic errors in the data. In this paper, we quantify the ability of the LSS data products of the spectroscopic survey of the Euclid mission, together with other contemporary surveys, to improve the constraints on deviations from CDM in the redshift range . We consider both currently available growth rate data and simulated data with specifications from Euclid and external surveys, based on CDM and a modified gravity (MoG) model with an evolving Newton's constant (denoted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
