Approximate combinatorial optimization with Rydberg atoms: the barrier of interpretability
Christian de Correc, Thomas Ayral, Corentin Bertrand

TL;DR
This paper investigates the interpretability challenges of using Rydberg atom-based quantum computers for solving general graph optimization problems, highlighting the limitations of current embedding and correction strategies.
Contribution
It evaluates two interpretation strategies for Rydberg atom embeddings, revealing fundamental limitations that hinder scalable, high-quality solutions for complex graphs.
Findings
Closest embedding correction yields high quality but is exponentially costly.
Ignoring defective regions is polynomial but degrades solution quality.
Defect scaling conflicts with known approximability conjectures.
Abstract
Analog quantum computing with Rydberg atoms is seen as an avenue to solve hard graph optimization problems, because they naturally encode the Maximum Independent Set (MIS) problem on Unit-Disk (UD) graphs, a problem that admits rather efficient approximation schemes on classical computers. Going beyond UD-MIS to address generic graphs requires embedding schemes, typically with chains of ancilla atoms, and an interpretation algorithm to map results back to the original problem. However, interpreting approximate solutions obtained with realistic quantum computers proves to be a difficult problem. As a case study, we evaluate the ability of two interpretation strategies to correct errors in the recently introduced Crossing Lattice embedding. We find that one strategy, based on finding the closest embedding solution, leads to very high qualities, albeit at an exponential cost. The second…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
