Characterization of mini-CryoCube detectors from the Ricochet experiment commissioning at the Institut Laue-Langevin
Antoine Armatol, Corinne Augier, Louis Bailly-Salins, Guillaume Baulieu, Laurent Berg\'e, Julien Billard, Juliette Bl\'e, Guillaume Bres, Jean-Louis Bret, Alexandre Broniatowski, Martino Calvo, Antonella Cavanna, Antoine Cazes, Emanuela Celi, David Chaize, Mohammed Chala

TL;DR
This paper describes the commissioning and performance of mini-CryoCube detectors in the Ricochet experiment, focusing on detector resolution, background rates, and initial neutrino scattering measurements near a nuclear reactor.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed characterization of mini-CryoCube detectors' performance during Ricochet commissioning, including resolution and background measurements, and initial neutrino recoil rate analysis.
Findings
Achieved 40 eV electron equivalent baseline resolution
Measured a nuclear recoil rate of 15 events/(kg day keV) during reactor-off
Set a 90% C.L. limit on background of < 9 events/(kg day keV) during reactor-on
Abstract
The Ricochet experiment aims to measure the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering process from antineutrinos emitted by a research nuclear reactor operated by the Institut Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France). This article presents a description of the Ricochet experimental installation and the detector performance achieved during its commissioning with a mini-CryoCube module consisting of three 42-gram germanium cryogenic calorimeters. The baseline resolutions and background levels are reported both during reactor-on and reactor-off periods, and as noise mitigation techniques were improved. A baseline resolution of 40 eV electron equivalent was achieved for the ionization channel after setup improvements, and the phonon channel resolutions ranged from 50 to 80 eV of total phonon energy. In the energy region from 2 to 7 keV, a nuclear recoil rate of 15(2) events/(kg day keV) is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
