Optimal quantum precision in noise estimation: Is entanglement necessary?
Shuva Mondal, Priya Ghosh, and Ujjwal Sen

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether entanglement is necessary for optimal noise estimation in quantum channels, finding that product states often suffice at high noise levels and characterizing entanglement's role across various scenarios.
Contribution
It demonstrates that for many local quantum noise channels, optimal probes are often unentangled, especially at high noise levels, and introduces the concept of continuous commutativity in this context.
Findings
Optimal probes are often unentangled at high depolarizing noise levels.
For local depolarizing channels, entanglement in optimal probes follows a staircase pattern with noise strength.
Product states are sufficient for optimal precision in high-noise regimes and for certain channels like the bit-flip channel.
Abstract
We ask whether the optimal probe is entangled, and if so, what is its character and amount, for estimating the noise parameter of a large class of local quantum encoding processes that we refer to as vector encoding, examples of which include the local depolarizing and bit-flip channels. We first establish that vector encoding is invariably ``continuously commutative'' for optimal probes. We utilize this result to deal with the queries about entanglement in the optimal probe. We show that for estimating noise extent of the two-party arbitrary-dimensional local depolarizing channel, there is a descending staircase of optimal-probe entanglement for increasing depolarizing strength. For the multi-qubit case, the analysis again leads to a staircase, but which can now be monotonic or not, depending on the multiparty entanglement measure used. We also find that when sufficiently high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
