Multi-fidelity Bayesian Data-Driven Design of Energy Absorbing Spinodoid Cellular Structures
Leo Guo, Hirak Kansara, Siamak F. Khosroshahi, GuoQi Zhang, Wei Tan

TL;DR
This paper compares Bayesian optimization and multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization in designing energy-absorbing spinodoid cellular structures, demonstrating that MFBO outperforms BO by up to 11% in maximizing energy absorption.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison of BO and MFBO in a real-world engineering problem, incorporating sensitivity analysis to improve design efficiency and providing open-source results.
Findings
MFBO outperforms BO by up to 11% in energy absorption.
Multi-fidelity approach reduces computational cost and improves optimization.
Sensitivity analysis helps in reducing problem complexity.
Abstract
Finite element (FE) simulations of structures and materials are getting increasingly more accurate, but also more computationally expensive as a collateral result. This development happens in parallel with a growing demand of data-driven design. To reconcile the two, a robust and data-efficient optimization method called Bayesian optimization (BO) has been previously established as a technique to optimize expensive objective functions. In parallel, the mesh width of an FE model can be exploited to evaluate an objective at a lower or higher fidelity (cost & accuracy) level. The multi-fidelity setting applied to BO, called multi-fidelity BO (MFBO), has also seen previous success. However, BO and MFBO have not seen a direct comparison with when faced with with a real-life engineering problem, such as metamaterial design for deformation and absorption qualities. Moreover, sampling quality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
