Lightcurves of stars in the Chamaeleon I Association
K. Neumannov\'a (1), L. Kue{\ss} (2), E. Paunzen (1), K. Bernhard (3) ((1) Department of Theoretical Physics, Astrophysics - Masaryk University, Kotl\'a\v{r}sk\'a 2, Brno, Czechia, (2) Department of Astrophysics - University of Vienna, T\"urkenschanzstra{\ss}e 17, Vienna

TL;DR
This study analyzes light curves of stars in the Chamaeleon I star-forming region using Gaia and NEOWISE data, identifying variable stars and their spectral types, mainly M-type young stellar objects.
Contribution
It combines spectral classification with light curve analysis to identify and characterize variable stars in Chamaeleon I, including members and non-members, using multiple survey data.
Findings
92 stars identified, 73 as members
55 Gaia and 69 NEOWISE light curves analyzed
28 stars classified as T Tauri and Orion variables
Abstract
Star-forming regions are essential for studying very young stellar objects of various masses. They still contain a significant amount of dust and gas. We present a study of light curves of stars in the field of the Chamaeleon I association. We use automatic spectral classification with MKCLASS to identify the spectral types of the stars in the field with a light curve from the NEOWISE and Gaia surveys. The light curves are analysed using the software Peranso and astropy. We also used VSX to identify the variability type. Based on astrometry, we have identified 92 stars, 73 of which are members of the association. We received light curves for 55 stars from the Gaia survey and for 69 stars from the ALLWISE/NEOWISE survey. For 28 of them, it was possible to determine the types of variables, mostly T Tauri and Orion variables. The spectral types of the members are mostly cooler M-type…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
