PHAX: A Structured Argumentation Framework for User-Centered Explainable AI in Public Health and Biomedical Sciences
Bahar \.Ilgen, Akshat Dubey, Georges Hattab

TL;DR
PHAX introduces a structured argumentation framework that enhances explainability in AI for public health and biomedical sciences by providing context-aware, user-specific explanations through defeasible reasoning and natural language techniques.
Contribution
It presents a novel multi-layer architecture combining argumentation, natural language, and user modeling to generate human-centered explanations tailored to diverse health stakeholders.
Findings
Demonstrated effectiveness in medical term simplification.
Enhanced patient-clinician communication through personalized explanations.
Supported policy justification with structured argumentation.
Abstract
Ensuring transparency and trust in AI-driven public health and biomedical sciences systems requires more than accurate predictions-it demands explanations that are clear, contextual, and socially accountable. While explainable AI (XAI) has advanced in areas like feature attribution and model interpretability, most methods still lack the structure and adaptability needed for diverse health stakeholders, including clinicians, policymakers, and the general public. We introduce PHAX-a Public Health Argumentation and eXplainability framework-that leverages structured argumentation to generate human-centered explanations for AI outputs. PHAX is a multi-layer architecture combining defeasible reasoning, adaptive natural language techniques, and user modeling to produce context-aware, audience-specific justifications. More specifically, we show how argumentation enhances explainability by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
