Sampling (noisy) quantum circuits through randomized rounding
Victor Martinez, Omar Fawzi, Daniel Stilck Fran\c{c}a

TL;DR
This paper introduces a classical sampling method based on randomized rounding that closely mimics the output distribution of noisy quantum circuits for combinatorial optimization problems, providing a benchmark for quantum advantage.
Contribution
It develops a classical surrogate for noisy quantum circuit sampling using Gaussian randomized rounding, applicable to two-body correlation problems like Max-Cut.
Findings
The classical sampler achieves an approximation ratio close to the noisy quantum circuit for Max-Cut.
Simulations and experiments confirm the classical method reproduces the energy distribution of noisy quantum circuits.
The approach offers a benchmark for assessing quantum advantage in noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
Abstract
The present era of quantum processors with hundreds to thousands of noisy qubits has sparked interest in understanding the computational power of these devices and how to leverage it to solve practically relevant problems. For applications that require estimating expectation values of observables the community developed a good understanding of how to simulate them classically and denoise them. Certain applications, like combinatorial optimization, however demand more than expectation values: the bit-strings themselves encode the candidate solutions. While recent impossibility and threshold results indicate that noisy samples alone rarely beat classical heuristics, we still lack classical methods to replicate those noisy samples beyond the setting of random quantum circuits. Focusing on problems whose objective depends only on two-body correlations such as Max-Cut, we show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
