Representations in vision and language converge in a shared, multidimensional space of perceived similarities
Katerina Marie Simkova, Adrien Doerig, Clayton Hickey, Ian Charest

TL;DR
This study shows that human visual and linguistic similarity judgments are based on a shared, modality-agnostic representational space that aligns with brain responses and can be modeled using large language model embeddings.
Contribution
It provides evidence that visual and linguistic representations in humans converge in a shared space, modeled effectively by LLM-based computational approaches.
Findings
Visual and linguistic similarity judgments converge behaviorally.
Shared neural network responses are predicted by these judgments.
Models trained on LLM embeddings outperform controls in explaining similarity structures.
Abstract
Humans can effortlessly describe what they see, yet establishing a shared representational format between vision and language remains a significant challenge. Emerging evidence suggests that human brain representations in both vision and language are well predicted by semantic feature spaces obtained from large language models (LLMs). This raises the possibility that sensory systems converge in their inherent ability to transform their inputs onto shared, embedding-like representational space. However, it remains unclear how such a space manifests in human behaviour. To investigate this, sixty-three participants performed behavioural similarity judgements separately on 100 natural scene images and 100 corresponding sentence captions from the Natural Scenes Dataset. We found that visual and linguistic similarity judgements not only converge at the behavioural level but also predict a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
