Prompt template for a fictitious LLM agent in a content-flagging experiment
Marie-Therese Sekwenz, Daria Simons, Alina Wundsam

TL;DR
This study explores how designers interpret and implement legal requirements from the EU's DSA in content-flagging tools, emphasizing the importance of participatory design to align legal compliance with user experience.
Contribution
It demonstrates how participatory design methods can effectively translate complex legal obligations into user-centered digital solutions, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.
Findings
Design choices can mislead or hinder user decision-making.
Participatory design bridges legal and technical disciplines.
Legal design enhances compliance and user trust.
Abstract
Digital regulations such as the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) represent major efforts to shape human-centered and human rights-based frameworks for society. Yet, as these laws are translated into practice, challenges emerge at the intersection of technology, law, and design. This paper presents a qualitative case study examining how designers act as mediators between abstract legal requirements and real-world digital experiences for users, focusing on the design of content reporting mechanisms under Article 16 of the DSA. Through an expert workshop with professional designers from diverse fields (N=9), we explore how legal obligations are interpreted by designers and reflected in discussions and design solutions. Our findings resonate with previous research on the design of reporting mechanisms and dark patterns, highlighting how UX design choices can mislead or hinder…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
